01
Plant and service work
Signals, support requests, schedules, and asset context
Clairon prepares evidence-backed operational briefs. An alarm, support request, or recurring review starts bounded context gathering; the person responsible gets the relevant history, open questions, and next check inside the system already in place.
A person always decides. Clairon never acts on your plant by itself.
An alarm, support request, or scheduled review marks the moment someone has to look. It does not assemble the relevant history, operating conditions, procedures, or approved external sources. The person responsible still has to rebuild that context before deciding what to check.
An alarm identifies a threshold breach. A support request describes a symptom. Neither says which history matters, what changed around it, or which procedure applies. The evidence remains scattered across systems and shifts.
A pump degrades, a schedule sticks, or energy use creeps upward without crossing a threshold. A recurring review can surface the pattern, but the person reviewing it still has to reconstruct the operating context before deciding what deserves attention.
Where Clairon sits
Clairon sits between the systems that raise the work and the person who decides. It reads the permitted evidence, returns a sourced brief, and keeps the evidence, brief, and human decision linked for the next relevant review.
01
Signals, support requests, schedules, and asset context
02
SCADA, CMMS, MES, historians, and approved procedures
03
Relevant context, open questions or likely causes, and the next check
04
Confirms, corrects, or escalates
The evidence, brief, and human decision stay linked, so the next relevant review can start from prior context instead of rebuilding it.
See it work
Follow a maintenance request, water-quality alarm, or recurring energy review from scattered evidence to the next useful check and a record the team can use again.
A technician accepts the request, receives a sourced pre-visit brief from approved context, and closes it with an exact record that can be checked later.
Frame 1 / 5
A technician is assigned a belt-conveyor request with a short description and three photographs. The maintenance platform remains the system of record.
Clairon reads through the interfaces already in place, shows the evidence behind every brief, and links the human decision to the operational record.
The agent engine is open source, and each brief stays linked to the evidence it used, the workflow that produced it, and the human decision that followed.
Existing monitoring and maintenance systems remain in place. Inference can run locally or on infrastructure you control, with EU hosting in Frankfurt for the services Clairon operates.
The system already in place triggers a defined event or review. Clairon gathers only the permitted evidence, returns a specific next check, and leaves the decision with a person.
Operational experience
Keep the record useful after the immediate response.
Clairon keeps the operational evidence, brief, and human decision together. When a similar situation returns — or a scheduled review checks the result — the prior record comes back as context. Corrective actions and effectiveness checks remain with the maintenance, quality, change, or training systems that already own the work.
Choose one alarm, support request, slow drift, or recurring review where people still have to gather the evidence, recall prior cases, and work out the next check from scratch.
A bounded first step
Clairon proves one read-only brief beside your existing monitoring or maintenance system before anything broader is considered.