Carry operationalexperience intothe next decision.

Clairon is a diagnosis layer for industrial monitoring. It turns an alarm or unexplained drift into an evidence-backed operator brief, while the monitoring stack already in place remains in control.

A person always decides. Clairon never acts on your plant by itself.

Some problems arrive as an alarm flood. Others never cross a threshold.

In an alarm flood, the signal that matters is buried among symptoms, nuisance alarms, and stale warnings. With a slow drift, nothing fires at all. In both cases, the person on duty has to rebuild the operating context before deciding what to check.

Too many alarms

A threshold can say that a value crossed a line; it cannot distinguish cause from symptom. Nuisance, chattering, and stale alarms arrive beside the event that matters, while the evidence and decisions that explain it are often scattered across shifts and systems.

No alarm at all

A threshold cannot recognize a drift that never crosses one. A pump degrades, a schedule sticks, or energy use creeps upward until the change surfaces later. Teams bridge the gap with experience, but the next review often starts by rebuilding the same context.

Where Clairon sits

Add diagnosis without replacing the stack.

Clairon sits between the monitoring evidence and the person who decides. It reads from the system already in place, returns an evidence-backed operator brief, and keeps the evidence, diagnosis, and human decision linked for the next relevant review.

01

Plant and assets

Signals, equipment state, and operating context

02

Existing monitoring

Alarms, history, rules, and dashboards

03

Clairon diagnosis

What changed, likely causes ranked, and the next check

04

Operator or technician

Confirms, corrects, or escalates

Prior context
Human decision

Incident record

The evidence, diagnosis, and human decision stay linked, so the next relevant review can start from prior context instead of rebuilding it.

Existing monitoring and automation remain in control. Clairon reads data and writes a diagnosis; it never operates valves, pumps, or machines.

See it work

A clear incident review, inside the monitoring stack already in place.

Follow the work from the first signal to a clear diagnosis, a human decision, and a record the team can use next time.

A vibration inspection, from evidence to the next safe check.

Illustrative Compressor A maintenance workflow using representative inspection evidence and a procedure-grounded review.

Frame 1 / 4

A technician’s inspection supplies the evidence: the asset, the location, and the meter reading. The review starts with what was observed, not an assumption about the cause.

Built the way industrial software should be.

Clairon reads through the monitoring interfaces already in place, shows the evidence behind every brief, and links the human decision to the incident record.

Inspect every diagnosis

The agent engine is open source, and each brief stays linked to the evidence it used, the workflow that produced it, and the human decision that followed.

Keep control of the stack and data

Existing monitoring remains in place. Inference can run locally or on infrastructure you control, with EU hosting in Frankfurt for the services Clairon operates.

Bound every AI task

Deterministic rules detect the event. Diagnosis runs for a defined incident or review, returns a specific next check, and leaves the decision with a person.

Operational experience

Keep the record useful after the immediate response.

Clairon keeps the monitoring evidence, diagnosis, and human decision together. When a similar situation returns — or a scheduled review checks the result — the prior record comes back as context. Corrective actions and effectiveness checks remain with the maintenance, quality, change, or training systems that already own the work.

  • Relevant prior context when a similar case returns
  • Monitoring evidence, diagnosis, and human decision kept together
  • Corrective action left with the system and team that own the work
  • Verification kept open until the follow-up evidence is complete

Bring one workflow where the context still has to be rebuilt.

Choose one alarm, slow drift, or recurring review where people still have to gather the evidence, recall prior cases, and work out the next check from scratch.

Clairon

A bounded first step

Start with one real workflow.

Clairon proves one read-only diagnosis beside your existing monitoring before anything broader is considered.

An alarm or recurring incident
Start with one event where the cause is still buried among symptoms, nuisance alarms, and disconnected evidence.
A slow drift or recurring review
Start with one process, energy, or equipment change that surfaces only after the cost or failure appears.

Tell Clairon about the workflow.

Describe the situation, and Clairon will suggest the most useful next step within two business days.

Need help framing it?
How Clairon handles enquiry data